The financial responsibility for a neutral third party facilitating dispute resolution is typically shared by the involved parties. For instance, in a business dispute, both companies might split the mediator’s fees. Different arrangements can be negotiated, however, such as one party covering the entire cost or a sliding scale based on ability to pay.
Covering the expenses associated with facilitated negotiation offers several advantages. It incentivizes all participants to actively engage in the process and work toward a resolution, as they have a vested financial interest. This shared responsibility can foster a sense of equality and collaboration. Historically, reliance on formal court proceedings often resulted in substantial legal costs. Facilitated negotiation presents a potentially more cost-effective and less adversarial path to resolving disagreements.
Continue reading “Who Pays for Mediation? Fees & Options Explained”