Generally, a will cannot be altered after the testator’s death. The document becomes a legally binding instrument upon death, distributing assets according to its stipulations. However, there are limited circumstances where a will might be subject to challenges or modifications after death. These typically involve legal processes such as contesting the will’s validity due to factors like undue influence, lack of testamentary capacity, or improper execution. Additionally, if ambiguities or inconsistencies exist within the document, a court may interpret its provisions, which can affect how assets are distributed. A later-discovered valid will might also supersede a previously known will.
The inability to modify a will post-mortem underscores the importance of careful estate planning. A clearly written, legally sound will ensures the testator’s wishes are respected and minimizes the potential for disputes among beneficiaries. Historically, wills have played a crucial role in the orderly transfer of property and wealth across generations, reflecting societal values and legal structures related to inheritance. The constraints surrounding post-mortem alterations reflect the finality of death and the importance of respecting the testator’s intent as expressed in their final testamentary document. This provides stability and predictability in the probate process.
The following sections explore the avenues available to interested parties concerned about the validity or interpretation of a will, as well as circumstances that might lead to the amendment or revocation of a will before death. These topics include challenging a will in probate court, addressing ambiguities and inconsistencies in testamentary documents, and understanding the legal requirements for creating and modifying valid wills.
1. No one (generally)
The principle that “no one” can generally change a will after the testator’s death underscores the fundamental nature of wills as final expressions of testamentary intent. This principle safeguards the deceased’s wishes and provides stability in the transfer of assets. Exceptions exist, but these generally involve court intervention to resolve disputes or clarify ambiguities rather than allowing arbitrary alterations.
-
Finality of Testamentary Intent
A will takes effect upon death, crystallizing the testator’s instructions. This finality prevents individuals, even close relatives, from modifying the will’s terms after the fact, protecting the decedent’s wishes from potential manipulation or undue influence. For instance, a disgruntled heir cannot simply add their name to the will after the testator’s passing.
-
Court Supervision, Not Individual Authority
While courts cannot rewrite a will, they can interpret its provisions, resolve ambiguities, and determine validity. This oversight protects the legal process and ensures fairness, but it does not grant individuals the right to directly alter the will. For example, a court can decide how to distribute assets if the wills wording is unclear, but it cannot add a new beneficiary at someone’s request.
-
Preservation of Estate Integrity
Preventing post-mortem changes ensures the estate’s orderly distribution according to the testator’s plan. This minimizes the potential for conflict among beneficiaries and facilitates the efficient administration of the probate process. Imagine the chaos if beneficiaries could constantly amend the will after death; estate administration would be endlessly protracted and contentious.
-
Importance of Pre-Death Planning
The inability to change a will post-mortem underscores the vital importance of thoughtful estate planning during the testator’s lifetime. Consulting legal counsel, ensuring the will is properly executed, and reviewing and updating it periodically are critical to avoiding potential challenges and ensuring wishes are accurately reflected. This emphasizes proactive preparation over post-mortem attempts at revision.
These facets highlight the rationale behind the general rule against post-mortem will changes. While exceptions exist, they are carefully circumscribed by legal procedures and overseen by the courts. This framework upholds the testator’s autonomy and promotes the orderly transfer of wealth according to their final wishes, ensuring a stable and predictable legal process.
2. Court (specific circumstances)
While a will generally cannot be changed after death, courts possess the authority to effectively alter its application under specific circumstances. This authority does not entail rewriting the will, but rather interpreting its provisions, resolving ambiguities, validating later-discovered wills, or upholding successful will contests. This judicial role acts as a safeguard, ensuring the fair and legal distribution of assets while upholding the testator’s intentions to the greatest extent possible. The court’s involvement is essential to resolving disputes and ensuring equitable outcomes in situations where strict adherence to the will’s literal terms might lead to unintended consequences.
For instance, consider a case where a testator bequeaths “my car” to a beneficiary, but owned two vehicles at the time of death. Here, the court would examine extrinsic evidence, like the testator’s usage patterns or statements to others, to determine which vehicle was intended. Similarly, if a will contains a provision that is unclear or contradictory, the court will interpret the language, considering the testator’s overall intent and applicable legal precedents. Another scenario involves a later-discovered will. If a valid will executed more recently than the initially probated will is found, the court will revoke the earlier will and administer the estate according to the later document’s terms. Will contests, often based on grounds like lack of testamentary capacity or undue influence, can also lead to a court effectively changing the distribution of assets by invalidating the contested will, either in whole or in part.
The court’s ability to intervene in these specific circumstances demonstrates the critical role of the judiciary in ensuring the proper execution of testamentary wishes. While direct alteration of a will post-mortem is generally prohibited, the court’s interpretation, validation, and adjudication powers ensure that the law upholds the principles of fairness, clarity, and testator intent. Understanding these limited yet crucial powers provides valuable insight into the legal framework surrounding wills and the crucial role of the courts in resolving complex estate matters.
3. Probate Process
The probate process plays a crucial role in determining the validity of a will and how its provisions are implemented after death. It is during probate that interested parties can raise concerns about the will’s authenticity or challenge its terms. The process itself does not inherently allow changes to a will’s content, but offers a structured framework for addressing disputes and interpreting ambiguities. This connection between probate and post-mortem will alterations stems from the courts supervisory role in probate proceedings. For example, if questions arise regarding the testators mental capacity at the time of signing, the probate court will assess the evidence presented and determine the wills validity. Similarly, allegations of undue influence exerted upon the testator can be scrutinized within the probate process, potentially leading to the will being deemed invalid. The practical significance of this understanding lies in its capacity to provide a legal avenue for addressing potential flaws or disputes related to a will. The probate court acts as a neutral arbiter, ensuring a fair and just resolution according to established legal principles.
Further emphasizing the link between probate and post-mortem will alterations is the court’s ability to resolve ambiguities or inconsistencies within the will. For instance, if a will includes contradictory clauses or uses unclear language, the probate court will interpret the testators intent, effectively shaping how the will’s provisions are carried out. Consider a case where a will leaves “the lake house” to a beneficiary, but the testator owned two properties on different lakes. The probate court would analyze evidence, possibly including extrinsic evidence like testimony from witnesses or the testator’s personal notes, to ascertain the testator’s intended beneficiary. The court’s interpretative function during probate, while not technically altering the will’s text, can significantly impact the distribution of assets, demonstrating the profound influence of probate procedures on the practical outcome of a will.
In conclusion, the probate process serves as a critical mechanism for addressing the complexities and potential disputes that can arise after a testators death. While the will itself remains unaltered after death, probate provides the procedural framework for validating the will, resolving challenges, and interpreting its provisions. This process clarifies how assets are ultimately distributed and reinforces the legal principles surrounding testamentary intent. Understanding the function and limitations of probate is essential for anyone involved in estate administration or seeking to understand the complexities of post-mortem asset transfer.
4. Legal Challenges
Legal challenges represent a crucial avenue for indirectly affecting a will after the testator’s death. While they cannot directly rewrite the document, successful legal challenges can invalidate a will entirely or specific provisions within it, effectively altering the distribution of assets. This connection between legal challenges and post-mortem will alterations stems from the court’s authority to adjudicate disputes and ensure the legal validity of testamentary instruments. Causes for such challenges often include allegations of undue influence, where a beneficiary exerted improper pressure on the testator, or lack of testamentary capacity, suggesting the testator lacked the mental acuity to understand the will’s implications. For example, if heirs can demonstrate that a caregiver coerced the testator into changing their will shortly before death, the court might deem the will invalid due to undue influence. Similarly, evidence of a severe cognitive decline might lead to invalidation based on lack of testamentary capacity. The practical significance of this understanding lies in its potential to rectify situations where a will does not accurately reflect the testator’s true wishes, offering a legal recourse for those who believe a will was improperly created or executed.
Further analysis reveals the complexity of legal challenges. Contesting a will often requires substantial evidence, legal expertise, and can be a time-consuming and expensive process. The evidentiary burden typically rests on the challenger, who must demonstrate the grounds for invalidation with clear and convincing proof. For instance, simply disagreeing with the will’s provisions is insufficient; the challenge must be based on legally recognized grounds. This complexity necessitates careful consideration before initiating legal action, balancing the potential benefits against the costs and uncertainties involved. Moreover, successful challenges do not necessarily result in a desired outcome. If a will is invalidated entirely, the estate might pass through intestacy laws, which may differ significantly from the testator’s intentions. In some cases, a prior will might be reinstated, leading to an outcome different from what any party involved had anticipated. Understanding these potential implications underscores the importance of seeking expert legal counsel before pursuing a will contest.
In summary, legal challenges offer a powerful, albeit complex, mechanism for addressing potential injustices related to a will’s validity after the testator’s death. While they cannot directly change the will’s text, successful challenges can invalidate the document or specific provisions, significantly impacting the estate’s distribution. However, pursuing such challenges requires careful consideration of the legal grounds, evidentiary requirements, and potential outcomes, including the financial and emotional costs involved. This nuanced perspective emphasizes the vital role of the legal system in ensuring testamentary documents reflect the testator’s true intentions and safeguarding the rights of beneficiaries.
5. Will Contests
Will contests represent a key mechanism for indirectly altering the practical effect of a will after the testator’s death. While a will contest does not technically change the document’s text, a successful challenge can invalidate the will in whole or in part, effectively altering the distribution of assets. This cause-and-effect relationship stems from the court’s authority to adjudicate disputes regarding a will’s validity. Grounds for will contests often include lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence, fraud, or improper execution. For example, if heirs successfully demonstrate that the testator suffered from a severe cognitive impairment at the time of signing, the court may deem the will invalid due to lack of testamentary capacity. Similarly, evidence of coercion or manipulation by a beneficiary could lead to invalidation based on undue influence. Consider a scenario where a caregiver isolates an elderly person and pressures them into bequeathing their entire estate, effectively disinheriting the testator’s family. A successful will contest in such a case could restore the estate’s distribution to the rightful heirs.
Further analysis reveals the practical significance of understanding will contests. These legal challenges serve as an important safeguard against fraud, coercion, and exploitation, ensuring that testamentary documents accurately reflect the testator’s true wishes. They provide a legal recourse for those who believe a will was improperly created or executed, protecting the rights of beneficiaries and upholding the principles of fairness and justice. However, will contests are often complex, time-consuming, and expensive endeavors. The burden of proof typically lies with the contestant, who must present clear and convincing evidence to support their claims. Furthermore, even a successful contest does not guarantee a specific outcome. Invalidating a will might result in the estate passing through intestacy laws, potentially leading to a distribution different from what any party involved desired. For instance, if a will is invalidated and the testator has no surviving spouse or children, the estate might pass to distant relatives the testator had little contact with. This underscores the importance of careful consideration and consultation with legal counsel before initiating a will contest.
In summary, will contests offer a powerful, albeit complex, means of addressing potential injustices related to a will’s validity. While they do not directly change the will’s text, successful contests can effectively alter asset distribution by invalidating the document or specific provisions. Understanding the legal grounds, evidentiary requirements, and potential outcomes of a will contest is crucial for anyone involved in estate administration or seeking to protect their rights as a beneficiary. This nuanced perspective reinforces the legal system’s role in upholding testamentary intent and ensuring a fair and just resolution of estate disputes.
6. Interpretation Disputes
Interpretation disputes represent a critical juncture where the seemingly immutable nature of a will after death encounters the fluidity of language and intent. While no individual can directly alter a will’s text post-mortem, court interpretations of ambiguous or contradictory provisions can effectively modify how the will’s instructions are implemented. This cause-and-effect relationship stems from the court’s authority to resolve uncertainties and ensure the testator’s wishes, to the extent ascertainable, are carried out. For example, a will might bequeath “the valuable collection of antique books” to a beneficiary. If the testator owned multiple book collections, an interpretation dispute could arise regarding which collection the will refers to. The court would then analyze evidence, potentially including extrinsic evidence like testimony from acquaintances or the testator’s personal notes, to determine the intended beneficiary of the specific collection. Similarly, vague or contradictory clauses within a will can give rise to interpretation disputes, requiring court intervention to clarify how the estate should be administered.
Further analysis reveals the practical importance of understanding interpretation disputes within the context of post-mortem will alterations. These disputes highlight the inherent limitations of language and the potential for discrepancies between a testator’s intentions and the written word. They underscore the crucial role of the courts in navigating these complexities and striving to achieve a just and equitable outcome. For instance, a will might stipulate that a beneficiary must “complete university studies” to inherit a certain sum. An interpretation dispute could arise regarding what constitutes “completion” achieving a bachelor’s degree, a master’s degree, or simply finishing a specific course of study. The court’s interpretation will significantly impact the beneficiary’s eligibility and the distribution of assets. This example illustrates how seemingly minor ambiguities can lead to substantial consequences, emphasizing the practical importance of clear and precise will drafting.
In summary, interpretation disputes highlight the dynamic interplay between the fixed nature of a will after death and the evolving interpretation of its provisions. While the will’s text remains unchanged, court interpretations can significantly impact how its instructions are carried out, effectively altering the distribution of assets. Understanding the nuances of interpretation disputes provides valuable insight into the challenges of post-mortem estate administration and underscores the importance of clear and unambiguous will drafting to minimize potential conflicts and ensure the testator’s wishes are respected.
7. Ambiguity Resolution
Ambiguity resolution plays a crucial role in addressing the complexities that can arise after a testator’s death, effectively shaping how a will’s provisions are implemented without technically altering the document itself. This connection stems from the court’s authority to interpret unclear or contradictory language within a will, thereby influencing the distribution of assets. Understanding ambiguity resolution provides valuable insight into the delicate balance between upholding testamentary intent and navigating the inherent limitations of language.
-
Latent Ambiguities
Latent ambiguities arise when the will’s language appears clear on its face but becomes ambiguous when applied to the testator’s specific circumstances. For instance, a will might bequeath “the house on Elm Street” to a beneficiary, but the testator owned two properties on Elm Street. Resolving this ambiguity requires examining extrinsic evidence, such as the testator’s usage patterns or statements to others, to determine the intended property. This process, while not changing the will’s text, can significantly impact which beneficiary receives which asset.
-
Patent Ambiguities
Patent ambiguities are evident on the face of the will itself, arising from unclear or contradictory language. For example, a will might contain conflicting clauses regarding the distribution of a specific asset, leaving its ultimate destination unclear. Resolving patent ambiguities often involves careful examination of the will’s language in its entirety, considering the testator’s overall intent and applicable legal precedents. While the court cannot rewrite the will, its interpretation shapes how the ambiguous provision is implemented, effectively influencing the outcome.
-
Extrinsic Evidence
Extrinsic evidence plays a vital role in resolving both latent and patent ambiguities. This evidence, external to the will itself, can include testimony from witnesses, the testator’s personal notes, or other documents that shed light on their intentions. Consider a case where a will bequeaths “my favorite painting” to a beneficiary. Extrinsic evidence, such as conversations the testator had about their art collection, might be necessary to identify the specific painting. The use of extrinsic evidence, while not altering the will itself, informs the court’s interpretation and shapes the distribution of assets.
-
The Court’s Role
The court plays a central role in ambiguity resolution, acting as a neutral arbiter in interpreting unclear or contradictory provisions. The court’s objective is to ascertain the testator’s intent to the greatest extent possible, considering both the will’s language and applicable legal principles. While courts strive to avoid rewriting wills, their interpretations effectively shape how the will’s provisions are implemented, demonstrating their significant influence on post-mortem asset distribution.
In conclusion, ambiguity resolution demonstrates how, while a will cannot be technically changed after death, the interpretation of its provisions can significantly impact the distribution of assets. The court’s role in resolving ambiguities highlights the complexities of post-mortem estate administration and underscores the importance of precise will drafting to minimize potential disputes and ensure the testator’s wishes are faithfully executed.
8. Later-discovered Wills
Later-discovered wills represent a unique exception to the principle that a will cannot be changed after death. While not technically a change to the original will, the emergence of a valid later-discovered will effectively supersedes the previously known will, altering the course of estate administration. This cause-and-effect relationship stems from the legal principle that the most recent valid testamentary document governs the distribution of assets. For example, suppose a will executed in 2010 is admitted to probate. Subsequently, a valid will executed in 2015 is discovered. The 2015 will, being the most recent expression of the testator’s wishes, will revoke the 2010 will and govern the estate’s distribution. This dynamic underscores the importance of thorough searches for testamentary documents during probate proceedings. A later-discovered will can significantly alter the distribution of assets, shifting inheritances among beneficiaries and potentially disinheriting those named in the earlier will. The practical significance of this understanding lies in its potential to reveal the testator’s true final intentions, even after an initial will has been accepted as valid. This possibility highlights the ongoing nature of testamentary intent and the importance of remaining vigilant throughout the probate process.
Further analysis reveals the complexity surrounding later-discovered wills. The validity of a later-discovered will remains subject to the same legal requirements as any other will. It must meet the formal requirements of execution, including proper witnessing and attestation, and the testator must have possessed testamentary capacity at the time of signing. Moreover, challenges can arise regarding the intent of the later-discovered will. Did the testator intend for the later will to completely revoke the prior will, or did they intend for specific provisions from both documents to remain operative? Resolving such questions often requires careful examination of the will’s language, consideration of surrounding circumstances, and potentially, court interpretation. For instance, if the later-discovered will only addresses specific bequests, it might be interpreted as a codicil to the prior will, amending rather than entirely replacing it. This complexity underscores the importance of engaging legal counsel experienced in estate matters to navigate the intricacies of later-discovered wills and ensure the testator’s final wishes are accurately and legally implemented.
In conclusion, later-discovered wills represent a significant exception to the general rule against post-mortem will alterations. Their discovery can significantly alter the trajectory of estate administration, highlighting the dynamic nature of testamentary intent and the importance of thorough searches for such documents. Understanding the legal requirements for validity, potential challenges to interpretation, and the practical implications of later-discovered wills is crucial for all parties involved in probate proceedings. This nuanced perspective reinforces the legal system’s commitment to honoring the testator’s most recent valid testamentary expressions and ensuring a just and equitable distribution of assets. The potential for a later-discovered will to emerge underscores the ongoing nature of testamentary intent and the need for meticulous estate planning and administration.
9. Codicil Provisions
Codicil provisions offer a legally sanctioned method for modifying a will before death, thereby indirectly influencing the distribution of assets after death. This connection arises because a codicil acts as an amendment to the existing will, altering its provisions without requiring the execution of an entirely new will. A codicil’s impact on post-mortem asset distribution stems from its legal integration with the original will. Upon the testator’s death, the will and any valid codicils are read together as a single, unified document. For example, a testator might execute a codicil to change the executor of their will, add a new beneficiary, or modify an existing bequest. Consider a scenario where a testator’s will leaves their estate equally to their two children. Subsequently, the testator has a third child. Executing a codicil to include the third child ensures all children are provided for after their death. This example illustrates the practical application of codicils in adapting to changing life circumstances.
Further analysis reveals the importance of codicil provisions as a component of estate planning. Codicils provide a streamlined mechanism for making relatively minor adjustments to a will without the complexities and costs associated with drafting a new will. They offer flexibility in adapting to evolving circumstances, such as the birth of a child, marriage, divorce, or the acquisition or disposal of significant assets. However, codicils are subject to the same legal requirements as wills, including proper execution with witnesses and testamentary capacity. An improperly executed codicil can be deemed invalid, leaving the original will’s provisions unaltered. For example, a codicil hastily written and signed without witnesses might be deemed invalid, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal formalities. This potential for invalidity underscores the necessity of seeking legal counsel when drafting or executing a codicil, ensuring its effectiveness in carrying out the testator’s wishes.
In summary, codicil provisions offer a crucial tool for modifying a will before death, indirectly influencing post-mortem asset distribution. Understanding the legal requirements and practical implications of codicils is essential for anyone involved in estate planning. While codicils cannot technically change a will after death, they offer a legally sound method for updating testamentary wishes during the testator’s lifetime, ensuring the will accurately reflects their intentions and minimizing potential disputes or unintended consequences during probate. The effective use of codicils contributes to a more adaptable and responsive approach to estate planning, allowing testators to adjust their plans as their life circumstances evolve.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following addresses common concerns and misconceptions regarding the possibility of altering a will after the testator’s death.
Question 1: Can a family member change a will after a death?
No. A will becomes legally binding upon death. Family members cannot alter its provisions. Legal challenges are possible but must be based on specific legal grounds, not simply disagreement with the will’s terms.
Question 2: What if the will is unfair or disinherits someone unexpectedly?
Perceived unfairness does not automatically invalidate a will. Legal challenges are possible based on grounds like undue influence or lack of testamentary capacity, but require substantial evidence.
Question 3: Can a will be changed if it contains errors or omissions?
Minor errors or omissions typically do not invalidate a will. Courts may interpret ambiguous provisions, but cannot fundamentally rewrite the will. Significant errors impacting the testator’s intent might lead to a legal challenge.
Question 4: If a later will is found, does it automatically replace the earlier will?
A validly executed later will generally supersedes prior wills. However, the later will must meet all legal requirements for validity, including proper execution and testamentary capacity.
Question 5: What role does probate play in addressing concerns about a will?
Probate provides a structured process for validating a will and addressing challenges to its validity. It is during probate that issues of testamentary capacity, undue influence, or improper execution may be raised and adjudicated.
Question 6: How can potential disputes regarding a will be minimized?
Careful estate planning, including consulting with legal counsel and ensuring the will is clearly written and properly executed, significantly reduces the likelihood of disputes arising after death. Regular review and updates to the will as circumstances change are also crucial.
Understanding these key points clarifies the complexities surrounding post-mortem will alterations and emphasizes the importance of proactive estate planning. Consulting with legal counsel is recommended to ensure testamentary wishes are documented accurately and effectively.
The next section explores the practical steps involved in creating and updating a will, providing guidance on ensuring your wishes are clearly expressed and legally sound.
Essential Tips for Ensuring Your Will’s Integrity
The following tips offer practical guidance for individuals seeking to ensure their testamentary wishes are respected and potential disputes minimized. These recommendations focus on proactive measures to clarify intent and solidify the will’s legal standing.
Tip 1: Consult with an Estate Planning Attorney:
Legal counsel provides invaluable expertise in navigating the complexities of estate law, ensuring the will adheres to legal requirements and accurately reflects the testator’s intentions. Professional guidance minimizes the risk of ambiguities or inconsistencies that could lead to disputes.
Tip 2: Execute the Will Properly:
Strict adherence to legal formalities, including proper witnessing and signing procedures, is crucial for establishing the will’s validity. Overlooking these requirements can render the will invalid, potentially leading to unintended consequences.
Tip 3: Use Clear and Unambiguous Language:
Precise wording minimizes the potential for misinterpretation. Avoid vague terms or contradictory clauses. Clearly identify beneficiaries and describe bequests in detail to prevent disputes over intent.
Tip 4: Keep the Will Updated:
Life circumstances change. Regularly reviewing and updating the will ensures it reflects current wishes and accounts for significant life events like marriage, divorce, the birth of children, or acquisition of substantial assets. This proactive approach avoids unintended consequences stemming from outdated provisions.
Tip 5: Store the Will Securely and Inform Relevant Parties:
Safeguarding the will’s physical integrity and informing the executor and trusted family members of its location ensures the document can be readily accessed and implemented after death. This transparency minimizes potential delays and uncertainties during probate.
Tip 6: Consider a Living Trust:
A living trust can complement a will and offers certain advantages, such as avoiding probate and providing greater control over asset distribution. Exploring this option with an estate planning attorney can determine its suitability for individual circumstances.
Tip 7: Document Testamentary Capacity:
If concerns exist about potential challenges to testamentary capacity, consider documenting sound mental state at the time of signing. This might include a letter from a physician or a video recording of the signing ceremony. Such documentation can strengthen the will’s validity and deter potential challenges.
These proactive measures significantly reduce the likelihood of post-mortem disputes and contribute to a smoother, more efficient probate process. By following these tips, individuals can ensure their testamentary wishes are carried out as intended.
The following conclusion summarizes key takeaways and emphasizes the importance of informed estate planning.
Who Can Change a Will After Death
Exploration of post-mortem will alterations reveals a nuanced legal landscape. While direct changes to a will’s text after the testator’s death are generally prohibited, avenues exist for indirectly impacting asset distribution. Court interpretations of ambiguous provisions, successful legal challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity or undue influence, and the emergence of valid later-discovered wills can all effectively alter the practical application of a will. Understanding these possibilities underscores the complexities of estate administration and the importance of pre-death planning. Proactive measures, such as consulting legal counsel, executing the will properly, and using clear language, minimize the potential for disputes and ensure testamentary wishes are respected.
The finality of a will underscores the importance of thoughtful estate planning. Individuals bear the responsibility to ensure their wishes are clearly articulated and legally sound. Seeking professional guidance and adhering to established legal procedures safeguard testamentary intent and facilitate the orderly transfer of assets, minimizing potential conflict and upholding the testator’s legacy.
